U.K., French, Journalists Confide:
"PRINCESS DIANA WAS ASSASSINATED."
This is Sherman Skolnick.
In the last few days I have interviewed, extensively,
well-informed United Kingdom (UK), French, and other journalists.
(And I promised never to use their names because of the nature of
what was discussed.) They told me that many of the distinguished
journalists in the United Kingdom are aware, from their own
reliable sources in key places in the government and elsewhere,
that British Intelligence had assassinated Princess Diana.
They went over details, of the specifics of how they, as
journalists, from their sources (separate from me), know about
the technical information on how the assassination was carried
But first of all, we have to discuss why the real story is not
being told, in print, or on the radio, or on television, in the
Not many know that in the UK they have the Official Secrets Act.
By that Act, the London government has the power, throughout the
UK, to order that certain subjects are absolutely forbidden to be
discussed. Currently, the forbidden subject is any discussion of
possible foul play in the death of Princess Diana and her
intended husband Dodi Fayed.
Further than that, any discussion is forbidden about how the
Official Secrets Act exactly works. When there is a subject that
an editor, publisher, or station manager believes would be
covered by the Official Secrets Act, they must immediately inform
the London government. And if the London government issues what
they call a "D Notice," then these media outlets throughout the
UK are not only forbidden to go forward with any story that
they're working on; but also, the D Notice serves as a potential
seizure: it authorizes the UK, through their various operatives,
to immediately seize and close down any printing plant that is in
the process of printing such a story, any radio station, or any
radio or TV transmitter. They are immediately seized by the
London government, closed down, and the publisher, the editor,
and the key personnel (including the writer of the story) are
immediately put under arrest.
And the worst part of it is, the rest of the media is not even
allowed to mention that these people have been arrested and their
publishing and transmitting facilities seized. In other words,
it is forbidden to discuss the D Notice and also forbidden to
discuss the technical operation of the Official Secrets Act. So,
there is censorship regarding the instruments of censorship.
The journalists I spoke with generally agree with what I found
out from other sources about how Diana was assassinated.
Apparently another car, a supposed "decoy car" which was to
protect her, in fact carried agents of British Intelligence. It
came up behind the Mercedes which Diana and the others were in
and hit it in some way. And there was already an arrangement
through others that a chemical slick was put on the roadway
within the tunnel. Ahead of the slick, a heavy construction
truck, on signal, backed into the tunnel and dropped or placed an
obstruction of a very heavy nature in the roadway. So any which
way it turned around, the Diana car could not have gotten away.
Thereafter, British Intelligence planted disinformation (and
continues to do so) throughout the world. (For example, "The car
came from a junkyard; it was formerly stolen; it's a defective
car," "The driver was drunk," "The speedometer was stuck at 120;
the car was going over 100 mph.") There's been a flood of these
fake stories promoted worldwide by British Intelligence, in which
the CIA has seen to it that the American press replicates these
Leading journalists in the UK agree with stories by me and others
that Diana was assassinated. And the simple reason for the
murder is, British Intelligence is pledged to protect the
monarchy. The monarchy was *not* going to have a new step-father
for the heir to the throne, Prince William; they weren't going to
have a Moslem.
Further than that, it comes out that Diana had already been given
an engagement ring by Dodi Fayed. What has *not* come out is
that she was 3-months pregnant.
So when you put that together, British Intelligence, under their
rules, was "justified" in wiping these people out for the
purposes of the monarchy, protection of the realm, and "national
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +