R. EMMETT TYRRELL, JR. PREDICTS . . .
R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., Editor-in-Chief of The American Spectator
Magazine, makes the following predictions in a mass mailing
received July 24, 1997.
** "...the Clinton White House is going to go sky-high...
Americans are going to be stunned as crime after crime is
** "Not one -- but several major scandals are certain to
rock the Clinton White House this year."
** Hillary Clinton "will be indicted." [CN: Mort
Kondracke, on PBS's "McLaughlin Group" said just the
opposite, that Hillary will *not* be indicted.]
** A "tidal wave of indictments" is "about to swamp the
** The Mena drug conspiracy will involve "not one, but TWO,
** The mainstream media knows "something bad is happening
to 'their boy [Bill Clinton],' but they just seem unable to
stop it. Well, here's a 'news bulletin' -- *THEY CAN'T*.
The Clinton presidency is now far beyond the point where a
friendly press corps can save it. No one can. Bill
Clinton is going to fight, cry, rage and strike back at his
opponents. He's going to turn the country inside-out to
save his skin."
American Spectator publisher Ronald E. Burr agrees:
"Very soon there will be *two* kinds of Americans...
(1) Those who are *stunned* by the enormity and scope of
Bill Clinton's crimes, once they are fully exposed.
(2) Those who *knew* the truth all along.
As I write, our nation is headed toward epochal events,
the likes of which we have not witnessed since Watergate.
Millions of Americans will end up shaking their heads and
thinking, 'Compared to Clinton, Nixon was a choirboy.'"
Conspiracy Nation would like to note at this point that it
neither necessarily agrees nor disagrees with the above
predictions. Given the relative stature of Tyrrell and the
American Spectator (actually fairly good, considering some of
their past scoops) their predictions are worthy of notice. A
mass-circulation publication such as American Spectator must have
some fairly decent sources, and Tyrrell/Spectator may know quite
a bit. On the other hand, if Tyrrell/Spectator prove wrong,
their enemies can rub the above predictions in their face.
Other items of note in the 7/24/97 mass-mailing:
** The White House has had a "plan to smear Whitewater
special prosecutor Ken Starr," says Tyrrell.
** According to Tyrrell, then-Governor Clinton "dipped
into" $6 Billion worth of Arkansas pension funds and is now
planning to raid American's retirement savings to fund his
** Clinton insider Betsy Wright suffered or still suffers
from clinical depression, apparently brought on by her
exhausting association with the President. (Not wishing to
attach any stigma to Ms. Wright, as clinical depression can
happen to anyone; I include this item because it is an
indicator: Vince Foster also, according to some, suffered
from some sort of anxiety/depression before his death in
July of 1993. The reported Wright depression *could* have
been brought on by a psychic upheaval, where Wright became
overwhelmed by the reality of Bill Clinton.)
Late breaking: Reports that 4 Buddhist nuns connected to
questionable "campaign contributions" (bribes) funneled through
Vice-President Al Gore have been granted some sort of immunity.
This eases the way for their testimony before the Senate
committee investigating shady campaign finances. Bearing in mind
scenarios spelled out by Sherman Skolnick and "Tom in Venice," is
this the prelude to an ouster of Al Gore? Remember that the
Skolnick et al. scenario was (a) Gore forced out (b) Sen. Jay
Rockefeller appointed Vice President (c) Clinton forced out (d)
Jay Rockefeller becomes President without an election.
Is the removal of Al Gore such a high price to pay for getting
rid of Clinton? This editor questions the view of "Tom in
Venice," that Al Gore is some sort of "knight in shining armor."
Also, the Conspiracy Nation scenario has been and is that Bill
Clinton will be made the "fall guy" for economic collapse. Don't
be misled by rose-colored "news" reports of the Greenspan/Federal
Reserve/Congress "love in" now taking place in Washington, DC.
Hardly reported by the TV networks (with CBS alone, to my
knowledge, offering at least scanty coverage) was DISSENT
expressed by Congress Critters directly in the face of Mr.
Greenspan. (This biased press coverage was underscored by Rep.
Barney Frank's opening remarks, in which he pointed out that 95
percent of mainstream reportage on those disagreeing with Fed
policies called their dissent "Fed bashing" and/or other
implicitly dismissive pejoratives.) REMEMBER: BILL CLINTON IS
JUST A STOOGE. As Larry Nichols pointed out long ago, "Bill
Clinton is not the power. He's just a cheap tin man." The real
power, says Nichols (and I agree), stands in the shadows. But
when this false economy comes down, those in the shadows aren't
going to take heat from furious Americans; Bill Clinton now
stands in the wings, ready to step forward for his final role of
having rotten eggs and tomatoes thrown at him.
And don't be misled either by "Dow Tops 8000." The unreal
stock market highs are the most alarming news of all.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
For related stories, visit: