Sherman Skolnick Commentary 09/30/96
(From Mr. Skolnick's recorded message: 312-731-1100)
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 S. Oglesby.
Some say the First Lady is facing criminal indictments, and the
indictments (some state, some federal) have already been handed
up by a grand jury but the indictments have been sealed.
Is all this political? Before the election it would cause an
unprecedented situation. Bill Clinton might feel compelled to
resign, but at the same time release his impounded medical
records, showing, supposedly, some medical crisis -- such as, his
nose might fall off from having snorted cocaine over a period of
Release of indictments against Hillary after the election could
also be considered political. If the Independent Counsel knew
before the election, why would he time the release for after?
Of course, remember the Nixon situation: Prior to the 1972
landslide re-election, the press fakers played down Watergate.
By the Spring of 1973, however, Watergate was the buzzword most
And what is Hillary facing? In New York, charges of defrauding
the state while a consultant; in Little Rock, causing the
misappropriation of federally insured funds of a savings & loan;
in the District of Columbia, perjury and obstruction of justice
regarding both Travelgate and Filegate; that is, causing the
frame-up of White House Travel Office carry-over employees and
using FBI records to blackmail various persons, primarily those
of the Bush administration.
A good question: *When* are they going to indict Hillary and
Bill for the $50 million embezzlement and massive tax fraud that
is the subject of *our* civil damage suit against her and others?
So far, Hillary Clinton's defense is primarily to convince the
federal judges in Chicago that we are, supposedly, "bad people"
and no judge should listen to us!
Of course, the federal judges here already hate us for our
campaign of exposing bribery of the federal courts in Chicago.
Now whether before or after the election, the expected
indictments may cause a crisis. Even prior to the indictments
the stock market was already reaching new, all-time highs, and
headed for a crash. (Of course, cynics contend that the market
would rally! That is, happy to be rid of the Clinton White House
Now just consider the possibilities. The mass media liars and
whores might finally have to admit that White House Deputy
Counsel Vincent W. Foster, Jr. was murdered. And that Bill and
Hillary, supposedly his friends, covered it up. Vince Foster was
implicated in various types of espionage, such as selling nuclear
missile secrets to a foreign power; such as heading a project to
spy on foreign banks, both friend and foe; such as
money-laundering dope and gun-running funds, with Hillary, for a
Little Rock bond broker: some 18 Arkansas-based firms would be
scandalized for reportedly using dope loot to finance their
business -- including Tyson Chickens, J.B. Hunt truck line,
Wal-Mart, and Beverly Enterprises, the nursing home chain. The
whole mess involves both political parties: both Bill Clinton
and George Bush are criminally implicated in the CIA dope through
the airport at Mena, Arkansas. And the dope loot was reportedly
washed through the Garfield Ridge Trust & Savings Bank of
Chicago, owned by de-frocked congressman Dan Rostenkowski and
Hillary's brother, and then through the Chicago markets.
The bottom line? Maybe all of this is to pave the way for Jay
Rockefeller to become the President without an actual election.
Such as by an emergency, provided for under the 25th Amendment.
Will the press fakers surprise us with all of this someday?
*Or*, just dribble it out to get us used to a disaster?